Robot vendors may quote MW/day, m²/hour or panels/hour, but those figures depend heavily on row geometry, travel between rows, setup and site soiling. For manual tools, crew productivity is better estimated from reachable area per setup and time per row.
Two 10 MW sites can have very different row lengths, tracker spacing and access. A tool that cleans quickly on one long uninterrupted row may lose much of that advantage when crews constantly reposition.
Time a representative row, include moves and rinsing, then multiply by the number of similar rows. For an extension-pole workflow, reach and tool width can matter as much as raw scrubbing speed.
For “How Much Solar Capacity Can One Cleaning Robot Cover Per Day?,” these three models give you concrete products to compare against the requirements above, instead of leaving the answer at theory.
Our strongest starting point because 5–24 ft telescopic gives you a real capacity reference while Universal-style extension pole shows the format you are comparing.
A useful second comparison because Up to 89 in. reach gives you a real capacity reference while 2-in-1 cleaning head shows the format you are comparing.
A contrasting third option because 50 in. handle gives you a real capacity reference while Hose attachment shows the format you are comparing.